Why Did the West Imperialize East Asian Countries Essay Example

Why Did the West Imperialize East Asian Countries? Essay Why Did the West Imperialize East Asian Countries? : A positive or negative effect. Claire Lay East Asian History Rogers 10-1-2012 It was Marco Polos tales of encountering China for the first time, and talk of Asian spices, accounts of exotic raw materials, agriculture, new technology, and a large consumer population that that first enticed western ideals. Since the late 13th and early 14th centuries, missionaries have been back and forth through Asia spreading the Christian word; all though it was truly was Polo’s grand tales that spiked westerners’ interests in Asia. According to the dictionary imperialism is defined as, the policy of extending the rule or authority of an empire or nation over foreign countries, or of acquiring and holding colonies and dependencies, though some mite define it as an unequal and possible an unwanted dominative relationship between one nation and another. The true question is; did imperialism have a positive or negative effect on these East Asian countries? According to our book Westernization became popular and in 1890 Japan, from the style of clothing to even writing a western style constitution, also leading China to do the same. Imperialism, while invasive, did bring civilization and economic affluence to many third-world countries. â€Å"Modern transportation and communications technologies, such as the steamship, the railway, and the telegraph, knit the planet together, more tightly than ever before†[1]Western Imperialism introduced Asia to new western technologies, philosophies, and commercial markets. We will write a custom essay sample on Why Did the West Imperialize East Asian Countries? specifically for you for only $16.38 $13.9/page Order now We will write a custom essay sample on Why Did the West Imperialize East Asian Countries? specifically for you FOR ONLY $16.38 $13.9/page Hire Writer We will write a custom essay sample on Why Did the West Imperialize East Asian Countries? specifically for you FOR ONLY $16.38 $13.9/page Hire Writer Some could say that at the time the majority of East Asia was willing to accept the west’s intrusion, having a seemingly positive effect on the area. Originally Western Imperialism in Asia was intended for establishing new colonies, but in time it became way to secure new commercial markets for western made products and raw materials to feed back to their industrial industries[2]. â€Å"In eighteenth-century wave of westernization foreshadowed the current phenomenon of globalization in the late twentieth and early twenty-first centuries†[3]. By the 19th century, there was vast western imperialism throughout Asia; this is when westernization and imperialism began to take a negative turn ecologically for both Asia and the West. It was the large military presences used reinforce Imperialism throughout the world that put financial stress on many western nations. The overall cost of keeping up a foreign military and governments, and the time and money put into reinforcing them, left a financial burden on the West. The Chinese did not buy enough western products to counterbalance the flow of income leaving western markets. The west even put money into schools and institutions for Asians to learn western knowledge, and it was this mistake that made it only a matter of time before these suppressed societies used that knowledge to break free from western imperialism, Some Asian nations developed anti-western/anti-imperialism sentiment, eventually leading to many outbursts of economical and political confrontations such as the Opium Wars, domestic rebellions, all the way to the 1911 Revolution. In East Asia, the peak period of Westernization actually did not arrive until the early 20th century, but the deep forces underlying these changes had intruded much earlier[4]. The ecological and political effects of imperialism were different throughout the world, and led to the disruption and dislocation of many small societies throughout East Asia and the rest of the world, Europeans basically drew haphazard and illogical lines on their colonial maps of East Asia to establish their own territories, built massive manufacturing factories, and disrupted East Asia’s’ natural territories and pristine environment; the traditional societies were replaced by European businessmen, European militia, and investors. At first when it occurs it may seem to be positive effect, but in the long run, for example in this case it was a negative effect, but by the end of the 20th century the West was left with a large monetary deficit, and East Asia suffered with basically a dictatorship from the West, both were left with an up and coming war on their hands. Colonies in East Asia were heavily exploited and were given no rights to do anything, even though the West gave them modern culture. Colonies inside colonies would fight because they wanted independence and have their own government and rule. There were many ethnics group that had nationalistic feelings but could not accomplish anything and become a free nation because of Imperialism. In conclusion, there were many pros and cons of imperialism for both East Asia and the West. In my opinion both the West and East Asia suffered mostly negative effects of Westernization and imperialism. Works Cited Michael Schroeder. The Twentieth Century and Beyond: A Global History. McGraw-Hill Companies,Inc. , 2007. Holocombe, Charles. A History of East Asia: From the Origins of Civilization to the Twenty-First Century. Cambridge University Press, 2010. [ 1 ]. Holcombe, A History of East Asia, 191. [ 2 ]. Goff, Moss, Terry, Upshur, the 20th Century: A Brief Global History, 68. [ 3 ]. Holcombe, A History of East Asia, 191. [ 4 ]. Holcombe, A history of East Asia, 191.

Trotsky and The Bolshevik Government †Government (100 Level Course)

Trotsky and The Bolshevik Government – Government (100 Level Course) Free Online Research Papers Why did Trotsky maintain such a prominence in Bolshevik government from 1918 to the death of Lenin in 1924? History (100 level Course) Trotsky enjoyed prominence within Bolshevik government for his achievements before, during and after the Bolsheviks came to power: He was the â€Å"star† of the 1905 Revolution, heading the St. Petersburg soviet. He organised and implemented the Bolshevik seizure of power in 1917. He was head of the Red Army during and immediately after the successful civil war of 1918-20. As a result of these achievements he enjoyed powerful support from within the party, particularly from left-wing activists and from young Bolsheviks. This support in itself ensured his prominence. In party and government terms he could not be ignored. Trotsky’s prominence was assured by his closeness to Lenin. He’d known Lenin since 1902. Despite differing views before 1917, Lenin liked and admired Trotsky. In his testament he described him as â€Å"outstanding† and was happy to give Trotsky his absolute trust. As a result, he was prepared to delegate key tasks. As commissar for foreign affairs, he was entrusted with the task of making peace with the Germans in 1918. Later, he was closely associated with COMINTERN, the body Lenin created to help spread world revolution. He was made head of the Red Army at a time when no such army existed. He created it, organised its structure and had general control over its winning tactics during the civil war, subsequently during the war with Poland and finally during the siege of the Kronstadt naval base (1921). He was a key figure in the Politburo, acting as something of an ideas man. It was he, for example, who came up with the idea for the NEP. Trotsky’s closeness to Lenin gave him positions of authority within the government that equated to deputy leader. It also gave him a standing and authority that could not be ignored. Trotsky’s closeness to Lenin was based on more than personal regard. The two men shared views about the development of government policy. They shared a common view on world revolution. Both expected socialist revolutions to break out in the wake of the Bolshevik seizure of power. Policy towards peace with Germany was conditioned by the view that peace would bring revolution. Out of this came the policy of â€Å"neither peace nor war† that stalled peace negotiations at Brest-Litovsk for weeks. The failure of Germany to fall to an immediate socialist revolution did not deter Trotsky and Lenin. Both believed that the survival of socialism in Russia was dependent on world revolution. They therefore sought to ferment it through the establishment of the COMINTERN, a body that worked with Communists from throughout Europe. During the civil war both Lenin and Trotsky applied â€Å"war communism†. Where Lenin brought in specialists from the bourgeoisie to run industry, Trotsky brought in former Tsarist officers to run the army. Where Trotsky re-applied military discipline to the armed forces, Lenin applied it equally to the industrial workers. After 1921, Trotsky and Lenin moved Russia towards the NEP. Trotsky dreamed it up, Lenin supported him and put in charge of economic policy. Only illness prevented him from developing the role more fully. In 1924 the two came together again. Both were concerned at the bureaucratisation of the party and feared the power it gave to people like Stalin. Given the impetus that Lenin and Trotsky gave the movement in policy matters, it was not surprising that Trotsky retained a key role in government. Further, with his ability to speak out and convince, he was often the person who fronted these policy developments. Towards the end of the period, Trotsky’s prominence turned to notoriety in the eyes of others. Lenin’s illness and subsequent death made Trotsky the heir-apparent and sparked reaction from the likes of Stalin, Zinoviev and Kamenev. His close association with Lenin’s policies provoked a similar reaction. Stalin opposed him on world revolution. Stalin, Zinoviev and Kamenev, all key party figures, opposed him on the issue of bureaucratisation. He was cast as Napoleon at a time when others sought more consensus in government. Not surprisingly, by the end of 1924 he was a marked man. Research Papers on Trotsky and The Bolshevik Government - Government (100 Level Course)Appeasement Policy Towards the Outbreak of World War 2Assess the importance of Nationalism 1815-1850 EuropeQuebec and CanadaBringing Democracy to AfricaUnreasonable Searches and SeizuresPETSTEL analysis of IndiaTwilight of the UAWCapital Punishment19 Century Society: A Deeply Divided EraGenetic Engineering

Individuals Differing in Gender Statistics Project

Individuals Differing in Gender - Statistics Project Example Relation with mother Satisfaction with self Max 4 5 3rd Quartile 4 4.25 Median 3 4 1st Quartile 3 3.75 Min 2 2 Table 2 displays the calculations required to be done to plot a box plot of the variable data. The calculations are done using standard formulae in Excel 2007 Table 3 Frequency Distribution of the variables Variable Key Frequency Relation With Mother Not in touch/no mom (1) 0 Not very close (2) 3 Somewhat close (3) 13 Very close (4) 12 Like The Way I am FALSE(1) 0 Mostly false(2) 1 Sometimes false sometimes true(3) 6 mostly true(4) 14 true(5) 7 Death of Someone Close Yes= 1 11 No= 0 15 Considered suicide last yr Yes= 1 2 No= 0 24 In Table 3, a frequency distribution of scores of various variables is provided. Thus it can be observed that no individual is observed to have no contact what so ever with their mother. Some or the other form of relation is maintained in all the individuals. Also most individuals are somewhat or very close with their mother. Table 4 Values of statistical calculations of the variable scores Variable Standard DeviationRange Interquartile Range Relation With Mother 0.816496581 4 1 Like The Way I am 0.792658109 5 1.5 Death of Someone Close 0.816496581 2 2 Considered suicide last yr 0.817862341 2 3.75 The standard deviation explores the spread of scores which is calculated by looking at the differences between individual values and the mean. Thus, with a small SD we would known that a lot of values are close to the average value. Whereas, a large SD would indicate that values...Thus an idea about the shape and distribution of the data is obtained. Hence for the variable of relationship with mother the clustering around score 3 corresponds that most individuals share "somewhat close" relationship with mother whereas a clustering around score 4 for satisfaction with self implies that most individuals are at most times satisfied with their own selves from the legend. In Table 3, a frequency distribution of scores of various variables is provided. Thus it can be observed that no individual is observed to have no contact what so ever with their mother. Some or the other form of relation is maintained in all the individuals. Also most individuals are somewhat or very close with their mother. The standard deviation explores the spread of scores which is calculated by looking at the differences between individual values and the mean. Thus, with a small SD we would known that a lot of values are close to the average value. Whereas, a large SD would indicate that values are generally further away from the average value. Here in Table 4 we observe a more or less uniform standard deviation of around 0.8 which indicates that all variables have scores distributed comparably. The range gives us an idea of the limits in which the spread of the scores is occurring.